make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-imx1.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-intel-lgm.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-visconti.o
Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro.
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240610-md-drivers-pwm-v2-1-b337cfaa70ea@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org>
Instead of requiring each driver to care for assigning the owner member
of struct pwm_ops, handle that implicitly using a macro. Note that the
owner member has to be moved to struct pwm_chip, as the ops structure
usually lives in read-only memory and so cannot be modified.
The upside is that new low level drivers cannot forget the assignment and
save one line each. The pwm-crc driver didn't assign .owner, that's not
a problem in practice though as the driver cannot be compiled as a
module.
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> # Intel LPSS
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> # pwm-{bcm,brcm}*.c
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> # sun4i
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp> # pwm-visconti
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> # pwm-rockchip
Acked-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> # pwm-sl28cpld
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> # pwm-meson
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230804142707.412137-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
.get_state() might fail in some cases. To make it possible that a driver
signals such a failure change the prototype of .get_state() to return an
error code.
This patch was created using coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@p1@
identifier getstatefunc;
identifier driver;
@@
struct pwm_ops driver = {
...,
.get_state = getstatefunc
,...
};
@p2@
identifier p1.getstatefunc;
identifier chip, pwm, state;
@@
-void
+int
getstatefunc(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state)
{
...
- return;
+ return 0;
...
}
plus the actual change of the prototype in include/linux/pwm.h (plus some
manual fixing of indentions and empty lines).
So for now all drivers return success unconditionally. They are adapted
in the following patches to make the changes easier reviewable.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>
Acked-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221130152148.2769768-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: zhaoxiao <long870912@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
With the original code a request for period = 65536000 ns and period =
32768000 ns yields the same register settings (which results in 32768000
ns) because the value for pwmc0 was miscalculated.
Also simplify using that fls(0) is 0.
Fixes: 721b595744 ("pwm: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti SoC PWM support")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Add driver for the PWM controller on Toshiba Visconti ARM SoC.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: fix up a couple of checkpatch warnings]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
