From d0b98f6a17a5cb336121302bce0c97eb5fe32d16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eduard Zingerman Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:39:11 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: disallow 40-bytes extra stack for bpf_fastcall patterns Hou Tao reported an issue with bpf_fastcall patterns allowing extra stack space above MAX_BPF_STACK limit. This extra stack allowance is not integrated properly with the following verifier parts: - backtracking logic still assumes that stack can't exceed MAX_BPF_STACK; - bpf_verifier_env->scratched_stack_slots assumes only 64 slots are available. Here is an example of an issue with precision tracking (note stack slot -8 tracked as precise instead of -520): 0: (b7) r1 = 42 ; R1_w=42 1: (b7) r2 = 42 ; R2_w=42 2: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -512) = r1 ; R1_w=42 R10=fp0 fp-512_w=42 3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -520) = r2 ; R2_w=42 R10=fp0 fp-520_w=42 4: (85) call bpf_get_smp_processor_id#8 ; R0_w=scalar(...) 5: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 -520) ; R2_w=42 R10=fp0 fp-520_w=42 6: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -512) ; R1_w=42 R10=fp0 fp-512_w=42 7: (bf) r3 = r10 ; R3_w=fp0 R10=fp0 8: (0f) r3 += r2 mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 8 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1 mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 7: (bf) r3 = r10 mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 6: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -512) mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 5: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 -520) mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-8 before 4: (85) call bpf_get_smp_processor_id#8 mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-8 before 3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -520) = r2 mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 2: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -512) = r1 mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 1: (b7) r2 = 42 9: R2_w=42 R3_w=fp42 9: (95) exit This patch disables the additional allowance for the moment. Also, two test cases are removed: - bpf_fastcall_max_stack_ok: it fails w/o additional stack allowance; - bpf_fastcall_max_stack_fail: this test is no longer necessary, stack size follows regular rules, pattern invalidation is checked by other test cases. Reported-by: Hou Tao Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241023022752.172005-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ Fixes: 5b5f51bff1b6 ("bpf: no_caller_saved_registers attribute for helper calls") Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Tested-by: Hou Tao Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241029193911.1575719-1-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 14 +---- .../bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c | 55 ------------------- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 3254c27085b8..bb99bada7e2e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -6804,20 +6804,10 @@ static int check_stack_slot_within_bounds(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_state *state, enum bpf_access_type t) { - struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux = &env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx]; - int min_valid_off, max_bpf_stack; - - /* If accessing instruction is a spill/fill from bpf_fastcall pattern, - * add room for all caller saved registers below MAX_BPF_STACK. - * In case if bpf_fastcall rewrite won't happen maximal stack depth - * would be checked by check_max_stack_depth_subprog(). - */ - max_bpf_stack = MAX_BPF_STACK; - if (aux->fastcall_pattern) - max_bpf_stack += CALLER_SAVED_REGS * BPF_REG_SIZE; + int min_valid_off; if (t == BPF_WRITE || env->allow_uninit_stack) - min_valid_off = -max_bpf_stack; + min_valid_off = -MAX_BPF_STACK; else min_valid_off = -state->allocated_stack; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c index 9da97d2efcd9..5094c288cfd7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c @@ -790,61 +790,6 @@ __naked static void cumulative_stack_depth_subprog(void) :: __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id) : __clobber_all); } -SEC("raw_tp") -__arch_x86_64 -__log_level(4) -__msg("stack depth 512") -__xlated("0: r1 = 42") -__xlated("1: *(u64 *)(r10 -512) = r1") -__xlated("2: w0 = ") -__xlated("3: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)") -__xlated("4: r0 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)") -__xlated("5: exit") -__success -__naked int bpf_fastcall_max_stack_ok(void) -{ - asm volatile( - "r1 = 42;" - "*(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack]) = r1;" - "*(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack_8]) = r1;" - "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];" - "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack_8]);" - "exit;" - : - : __imm_const(max_bpf_stack, MAX_BPF_STACK), - __imm_const(max_bpf_stack_8, MAX_BPF_STACK + 8), - __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id) - : __clobber_all - ); -} - -SEC("raw_tp") -__arch_x86_64 -__log_level(4) -__msg("stack depth 520") -__failure -__naked int bpf_fastcall_max_stack_fail(void) -{ - asm volatile( - "r1 = 42;" - "*(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack]) = r1;" - "*(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack_8]) = r1;" - "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];" - "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack_8]);" - /* call to prandom blocks bpf_fastcall rewrite */ - "*(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack_8]) = r1;" - "call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];" - "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack_8]);" - "exit;" - : - : __imm_const(max_bpf_stack, MAX_BPF_STACK), - __imm_const(max_bpf_stack_8, MAX_BPF_STACK + 8), - __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id), - __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32) - : __clobber_all - ); -} - SEC("cgroup/getsockname_unix") __xlated("0: r2 = 1") /* bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx is replaced by a single assignment */