linux/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c

147 lines
3.3 KiB
C
Raw Permalink Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
/*
* Copyright 2018-2020 NXP.
*/
#include <dt-bindings/firmware/imx/rsrc.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/firmware/imx/sci.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/thermal.h>
#include "thermal_hwmon.h"
#define IMX_SC_MISC_FUNC_GET_TEMP 13
static struct imx_sc_ipc *thermal_ipc_handle;
struct imx_sc_sensor {
struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
u32 resource_id;
};
struct req_get_temp {
u16 resource_id;
u8 type;
} __packed __aligned(4);
struct resp_get_temp {
s16 celsius;
s8 tenths;
} __packed __aligned(4);
struct imx_sc_msg_misc_get_temp {
struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr;
union {
struct req_get_temp req;
struct resp_get_temp resp;
} data;
} __packed __aligned(4);
static int imx_sc_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
{
struct imx_sc_msg_misc_get_temp msg;
struct imx_sc_rpc_msg *hdr = &msg.hdr;
2023-03-01 20:14:30 +00:00
struct imx_sc_sensor *sensor = thermal_zone_device_priv(tz);
int ret;
msg.data.req.resource_id = sensor->resource_id;
msg.data.req.type = IMX_SC_C_TEMP;
hdr->ver = IMX_SC_RPC_VERSION;
hdr->svc = IMX_SC_RPC_SVC_MISC;
hdr->func = IMX_SC_MISC_FUNC_GET_TEMP;
hdr->size = 2;
ret = imx_scu_call_rpc(thermal_ipc_handle, &msg, true);
if (ret)
return ret;
*temp = msg.data.resp.celsius * 1000 + msg.data.resp.tenths * 100;
return 0;
}
static const struct thermal_zone_device_ops imx_sc_thermal_ops = {
.get_temp = imx_sc_thermal_get_temp,
};
static int imx_sc_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct imx_sc_sensor *sensor;
thermal/drivers/imx_sc: Rely on the platform data to get the resource id Currently the imx_sc driver is reimplementing part of the thermal zone parsing from the thermal OF tree code to get the sensor id associated with a thermal zone sensor. The driver platform specific code should know what sensor is present and not rely on the thermal zone description to do a discovery. Well that is arguable but all the other drivers have a per platform data telling what sensor id to use. The imx_sc thermal driver is the only one using a different approach. Not invalid but forcing to keep a specific function 'thermal_zone_of_get_sensor_id()' to get the sensor id for a specific thermal zone as the self-explanatory function tells and having device tree code inside the driver. The thermal OF code had a rework and remains now self-encapsulated with a register/unregister functions and their 'devm' variants, except for the function mentioned above. After investigating, it appears the imx_sc sensor is defined in arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi: which defines the cpu-thermal zone with the id: IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM This dtsi is included by: - imx8qxp-ai_ml.dts - imx8qxp-colibri.dtsi - imx8qxp-mek.dts The two first ones do not define more thermal zones The third one adds the pmic-thermal0 zone with id: IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0 The thermal OF code returns -ENODEV if the thermal zone registration with a specific id fails because the description is not available in the DT for such a sensor id. In this case we continue with the other ids without bailing out with an error. So we can build for the 'fsl,imx-sc-thermal' a compatible data, an array of sensor ids containing IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM and IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0. The latter won't be found but that will not result in an error but a normal case where we continue the initialization with other ids. Just to clarify, it is what the thermal framework does and what the other drivers are expecting: when a registration fails with -ENODEV this is not an error but a case where the description is not found in the device tree, that be can the entire thermal zones description or a specific thermal zone with an unknown id. There is one small functional change but without impact. When there is no 'thermal-zones' description the probe function was returning '-ENODEV', now it returns zero. When a thermal zone fails to register with an error different from '-ENODEV', the error is detected and returned. Change the code accordingly and remove the OF code from the driver. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818082316.2717095-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-08-18 08:23:15 +00:00
const int *resource_id;
int i, ret;
ret = imx_scu_get_handle(&thermal_ipc_handle);
if (ret)
return ret;
thermal/drivers/imx_sc: Rely on the platform data to get the resource id Currently the imx_sc driver is reimplementing part of the thermal zone parsing from the thermal OF tree code to get the sensor id associated with a thermal zone sensor. The driver platform specific code should know what sensor is present and not rely on the thermal zone description to do a discovery. Well that is arguable but all the other drivers have a per platform data telling what sensor id to use. The imx_sc thermal driver is the only one using a different approach. Not invalid but forcing to keep a specific function 'thermal_zone_of_get_sensor_id()' to get the sensor id for a specific thermal zone as the self-explanatory function tells and having device tree code inside the driver. The thermal OF code had a rework and remains now self-encapsulated with a register/unregister functions and their 'devm' variants, except for the function mentioned above. After investigating, it appears the imx_sc sensor is defined in arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi: which defines the cpu-thermal zone with the id: IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM This dtsi is included by: - imx8qxp-ai_ml.dts - imx8qxp-colibri.dtsi - imx8qxp-mek.dts The two first ones do not define more thermal zones The third one adds the pmic-thermal0 zone with id: IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0 The thermal OF code returns -ENODEV if the thermal zone registration with a specific id fails because the description is not available in the DT for such a sensor id. In this case we continue with the other ids without bailing out with an error. So we can build for the 'fsl,imx-sc-thermal' a compatible data, an array of sensor ids containing IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM and IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0. The latter won't be found but that will not result in an error but a normal case where we continue the initialization with other ids. Just to clarify, it is what the thermal framework does and what the other drivers are expecting: when a registration fails with -ENODEV this is not an error but a case where the description is not found in the device tree, that be can the entire thermal zones description or a specific thermal zone with an unknown id. There is one small functional change but without impact. When there is no 'thermal-zones' description the probe function was returning '-ENODEV', now it returns zero. When a thermal zone fails to register with an error different from '-ENODEV', the error is detected and returned. Change the code accordingly and remove the OF code from the driver. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818082316.2717095-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-08-18 08:23:15 +00:00
resource_id = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
if (!resource_id)
return -EINVAL;
for (i = 0; resource_id[i] >= 0; i++) {
sensor = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
thermal/drivers/imx_sc: Rely on the platform data to get the resource id Currently the imx_sc driver is reimplementing part of the thermal zone parsing from the thermal OF tree code to get the sensor id associated with a thermal zone sensor. The driver platform specific code should know what sensor is present and not rely on the thermal zone description to do a discovery. Well that is arguable but all the other drivers have a per platform data telling what sensor id to use. The imx_sc thermal driver is the only one using a different approach. Not invalid but forcing to keep a specific function 'thermal_zone_of_get_sensor_id()' to get the sensor id for a specific thermal zone as the self-explanatory function tells and having device tree code inside the driver. The thermal OF code had a rework and remains now self-encapsulated with a register/unregister functions and their 'devm' variants, except for the function mentioned above. After investigating, it appears the imx_sc sensor is defined in arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi: which defines the cpu-thermal zone with the id: IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM This dtsi is included by: - imx8qxp-ai_ml.dts - imx8qxp-colibri.dtsi - imx8qxp-mek.dts The two first ones do not define more thermal zones The third one adds the pmic-thermal0 zone with id: IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0 The thermal OF code returns -ENODEV if the thermal zone registration with a specific id fails because the description is not available in the DT for such a sensor id. In this case we continue with the other ids without bailing out with an error. So we can build for the 'fsl,imx-sc-thermal' a compatible data, an array of sensor ids containing IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM and IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0. The latter won't be found but that will not result in an error but a normal case where we continue the initialization with other ids. Just to clarify, it is what the thermal framework does and what the other drivers are expecting: when a registration fails with -ENODEV this is not an error but a case where the description is not found in the device tree, that be can the entire thermal zones description or a specific thermal zone with an unknown id. There is one small functional change but without impact. When there is no 'thermal-zones' description the probe function was returning '-ENODEV', now it returns zero. When a thermal zone fails to register with an error different from '-ENODEV', the error is detected and returned. Change the code accordingly and remove the OF code from the driver. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818082316.2717095-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-08-18 08:23:15 +00:00
if (!sensor)
return -ENOMEM;
thermal/drivers/imx_sc: Rely on the platform data to get the resource id Currently the imx_sc driver is reimplementing part of the thermal zone parsing from the thermal OF tree code to get the sensor id associated with a thermal zone sensor. The driver platform specific code should know what sensor is present and not rely on the thermal zone description to do a discovery. Well that is arguable but all the other drivers have a per platform data telling what sensor id to use. The imx_sc thermal driver is the only one using a different approach. Not invalid but forcing to keep a specific function 'thermal_zone_of_get_sensor_id()' to get the sensor id for a specific thermal zone as the self-explanatory function tells and having device tree code inside the driver. The thermal OF code had a rework and remains now self-encapsulated with a register/unregister functions and their 'devm' variants, except for the function mentioned above. After investigating, it appears the imx_sc sensor is defined in arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi: which defines the cpu-thermal zone with the id: IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM This dtsi is included by: - imx8qxp-ai_ml.dts - imx8qxp-colibri.dtsi - imx8qxp-mek.dts The two first ones do not define more thermal zones The third one adds the pmic-thermal0 zone with id: IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0 The thermal OF code returns -ENODEV if the thermal zone registration with a specific id fails because the description is not available in the DT for such a sensor id. In this case we continue with the other ids without bailing out with an error. So we can build for the 'fsl,imx-sc-thermal' a compatible data, an array of sensor ids containing IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM and IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0. The latter won't be found but that will not result in an error but a normal case where we continue the initialization with other ids. Just to clarify, it is what the thermal framework does and what the other drivers are expecting: when a registration fails with -ENODEV this is not an error but a case where the description is not found in the device tree, that be can the entire thermal zones description or a specific thermal zone with an unknown id. There is one small functional change but without impact. When there is no 'thermal-zones' description the probe function was returning '-ENODEV', now it returns zero. When a thermal zone fails to register with an error different from '-ENODEV', the error is detected and returned. Change the code accordingly and remove the OF code from the driver. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818082316.2717095-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-08-18 08:23:15 +00:00
sensor->resource_id = resource_id[i];
thermal/drivers/imx_sc: Rely on the platform data to get the resource id Currently the imx_sc driver is reimplementing part of the thermal zone parsing from the thermal OF tree code to get the sensor id associated with a thermal zone sensor. The driver platform specific code should know what sensor is present and not rely on the thermal zone description to do a discovery. Well that is arguable but all the other drivers have a per platform data telling what sensor id to use. The imx_sc thermal driver is the only one using a different approach. Not invalid but forcing to keep a specific function 'thermal_zone_of_get_sensor_id()' to get the sensor id for a specific thermal zone as the self-explanatory function tells and having device tree code inside the driver. The thermal OF code had a rework and remains now self-encapsulated with a register/unregister functions and their 'devm' variants, except for the function mentioned above. After investigating, it appears the imx_sc sensor is defined in arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi: which defines the cpu-thermal zone with the id: IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM This dtsi is included by: - imx8qxp-ai_ml.dts - imx8qxp-colibri.dtsi - imx8qxp-mek.dts The two first ones do not define more thermal zones The third one adds the pmic-thermal0 zone with id: IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0 The thermal OF code returns -ENODEV if the thermal zone registration with a specific id fails because the description is not available in the DT for such a sensor id. In this case we continue with the other ids without bailing out with an error. So we can build for the 'fsl,imx-sc-thermal' a compatible data, an array of sensor ids containing IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM and IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0. The latter won't be found but that will not result in an error but a normal case where we continue the initialization with other ids. Just to clarify, it is what the thermal framework does and what the other drivers are expecting: when a registration fails with -ENODEV this is not an error but a case where the description is not found in the device tree, that be can the entire thermal zones description or a specific thermal zone with an unknown id. There is one small functional change but without impact. When there is no 'thermal-zones' description the probe function was returning '-ENODEV', now it returns zero. When a thermal zone fails to register with an error different from '-ENODEV', the error is detected and returned. Change the code accordingly and remove the OF code from the driver. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818082316.2717095-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-08-18 08:23:15 +00:00
sensor->tzd = devm_thermal_of_zone_register(&pdev->dev, sensor->resource_id,
sensor, &imx_sc_thermal_ops);
if (IS_ERR(sensor->tzd)) {
thermal/drivers/imx_sc: Rely on the platform data to get the resource id Currently the imx_sc driver is reimplementing part of the thermal zone parsing from the thermal OF tree code to get the sensor id associated with a thermal zone sensor. The driver platform specific code should know what sensor is present and not rely on the thermal zone description to do a discovery. Well that is arguable but all the other drivers have a per platform data telling what sensor id to use. The imx_sc thermal driver is the only one using a different approach. Not invalid but forcing to keep a specific function 'thermal_zone_of_get_sensor_id()' to get the sensor id for a specific thermal zone as the self-explanatory function tells and having device tree code inside the driver. The thermal OF code had a rework and remains now self-encapsulated with a register/unregister functions and their 'devm' variants, except for the function mentioned above. After investigating, it appears the imx_sc sensor is defined in arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi: which defines the cpu-thermal zone with the id: IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM This dtsi is included by: - imx8qxp-ai_ml.dts - imx8qxp-colibri.dtsi - imx8qxp-mek.dts The two first ones do not define more thermal zones The third one adds the pmic-thermal0 zone with id: IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0 The thermal OF code returns -ENODEV if the thermal zone registration with a specific id fails because the description is not available in the DT for such a sensor id. In this case we continue with the other ids without bailing out with an error. So we can build for the 'fsl,imx-sc-thermal' a compatible data, an array of sensor ids containing IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM and IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0. The latter won't be found but that will not result in an error but a normal case where we continue the initialization with other ids. Just to clarify, it is what the thermal framework does and what the other drivers are expecting: when a registration fails with -ENODEV this is not an error but a case where the description is not found in the device tree, that be can the entire thermal zones description or a specific thermal zone with an unknown id. There is one small functional change but without impact. When there is no 'thermal-zones' description the probe function was returning '-ENODEV', now it returns zero. When a thermal zone fails to register with an error different from '-ENODEV', the error is detected and returned. Change the code accordingly and remove the OF code from the driver. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818082316.2717095-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-08-18 08:23:15 +00:00
/*
* Save the error value before freeing the
* sensor pointer, otherwise we endup with a
* use-after-free error
*/
ret = PTR_ERR(sensor->tzd);
thermal/drivers/imx_sc: Rely on the platform data to get the resource id Currently the imx_sc driver is reimplementing part of the thermal zone parsing from the thermal OF tree code to get the sensor id associated with a thermal zone sensor. The driver platform specific code should know what sensor is present and not rely on the thermal zone description to do a discovery. Well that is arguable but all the other drivers have a per platform data telling what sensor id to use. The imx_sc thermal driver is the only one using a different approach. Not invalid but forcing to keep a specific function 'thermal_zone_of_get_sensor_id()' to get the sensor id for a specific thermal zone as the self-explanatory function tells and having device tree code inside the driver. The thermal OF code had a rework and remains now self-encapsulated with a register/unregister functions and their 'devm' variants, except for the function mentioned above. After investigating, it appears the imx_sc sensor is defined in arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi: which defines the cpu-thermal zone with the id: IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM This dtsi is included by: - imx8qxp-ai_ml.dts - imx8qxp-colibri.dtsi - imx8qxp-mek.dts The two first ones do not define more thermal zones The third one adds the pmic-thermal0 zone with id: IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0 The thermal OF code returns -ENODEV if the thermal zone registration with a specific id fails because the description is not available in the DT for such a sensor id. In this case we continue with the other ids without bailing out with an error. So we can build for the 'fsl,imx-sc-thermal' a compatible data, an array of sensor ids containing IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM and IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0. The latter won't be found but that will not result in an error but a normal case where we continue the initialization with other ids. Just to clarify, it is what the thermal framework does and what the other drivers are expecting: when a registration fails with -ENODEV this is not an error but a case where the description is not found in the device tree, that be can the entire thermal zones description or a specific thermal zone with an unknown id. There is one small functional change but without impact. When there is no 'thermal-zones' description the probe function was returning '-ENODEV', now it returns zero. When a thermal zone fails to register with an error different from '-ENODEV', the error is detected and returned. Change the code accordingly and remove the OF code from the driver. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818082316.2717095-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-08-18 08:23:15 +00:00
devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, sensor);
/*
* The thermal framework notifies us there is
* no thermal zone description for such a
* sensor id
*/
if (ret == -ENODEV)
continue;
return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed to register thermal zone\n");
}
devm_thermal_add_hwmon_sysfs(&pdev->dev, sensor->tzd);
}
thermal/drivers/imx_sc: Rely on the platform data to get the resource id Currently the imx_sc driver is reimplementing part of the thermal zone parsing from the thermal OF tree code to get the sensor id associated with a thermal zone sensor. The driver platform specific code should know what sensor is present and not rely on the thermal zone description to do a discovery. Well that is arguable but all the other drivers have a per platform data telling what sensor id to use. The imx_sc thermal driver is the only one using a different approach. Not invalid but forcing to keep a specific function 'thermal_zone_of_get_sensor_id()' to get the sensor id for a specific thermal zone as the self-explanatory function tells and having device tree code inside the driver. The thermal OF code had a rework and remains now self-encapsulated with a register/unregister functions and their 'devm' variants, except for the function mentioned above. After investigating, it appears the imx_sc sensor is defined in arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi: which defines the cpu-thermal zone with the id: IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM This dtsi is included by: - imx8qxp-ai_ml.dts - imx8qxp-colibri.dtsi - imx8qxp-mek.dts The two first ones do not define more thermal zones The third one adds the pmic-thermal0 zone with id: IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0 The thermal OF code returns -ENODEV if the thermal zone registration with a specific id fails because the description is not available in the DT for such a sensor id. In this case we continue with the other ids without bailing out with an error. So we can build for the 'fsl,imx-sc-thermal' a compatible data, an array of sensor ids containing IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM and IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0. The latter won't be found but that will not result in an error but a normal case where we continue the initialization with other ids. Just to clarify, it is what the thermal framework does and what the other drivers are expecting: when a registration fails with -ENODEV this is not an error but a case where the description is not found in the device tree, that be can the entire thermal zones description or a specific thermal zone with an unknown id. There is one small functional change but without impact. When there is no 'thermal-zones' description the probe function was returning '-ENODEV', now it returns zero. When a thermal zone fails to register with an error different from '-ENODEV', the error is detected and returned. Change the code accordingly and remove the OF code from the driver. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818082316.2717095-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-08-18 08:23:15 +00:00
return 0;
}
static const int imx_sc_sensors[] = {
IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM, IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0,
IMX_SC_R_AP_0, IMX_SC_R_AP_1,
IMX_SC_R_GPU_0_PID0, IMX_SC_R_GPU_1_PID0,
IMX_SC_R_DRC_0, -1 };
thermal/drivers/imx_sc: Rely on the platform data to get the resource id Currently the imx_sc driver is reimplementing part of the thermal zone parsing from the thermal OF tree code to get the sensor id associated with a thermal zone sensor. The driver platform specific code should know what sensor is present and not rely on the thermal zone description to do a discovery. Well that is arguable but all the other drivers have a per platform data telling what sensor id to use. The imx_sc thermal driver is the only one using a different approach. Not invalid but forcing to keep a specific function 'thermal_zone_of_get_sensor_id()' to get the sensor id for a specific thermal zone as the self-explanatory function tells and having device tree code inside the driver. The thermal OF code had a rework and remains now self-encapsulated with a register/unregister functions and their 'devm' variants, except for the function mentioned above. After investigating, it appears the imx_sc sensor is defined in arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi: which defines the cpu-thermal zone with the id: IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM This dtsi is included by: - imx8qxp-ai_ml.dts - imx8qxp-colibri.dtsi - imx8qxp-mek.dts The two first ones do not define more thermal zones The third one adds the pmic-thermal0 zone with id: IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0 The thermal OF code returns -ENODEV if the thermal zone registration with a specific id fails because the description is not available in the DT for such a sensor id. In this case we continue with the other ids without bailing out with an error. So we can build for the 'fsl,imx-sc-thermal' a compatible data, an array of sensor ids containing IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM and IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0. The latter won't be found but that will not result in an error but a normal case where we continue the initialization with other ids. Just to clarify, it is what the thermal framework does and what the other drivers are expecting: when a registration fails with -ENODEV this is not an error but a case where the description is not found in the device tree, that be can the entire thermal zones description or a specific thermal zone with an unknown id. There is one small functional change but without impact. When there is no 'thermal-zones' description the probe function was returning '-ENODEV', now it returns zero. When a thermal zone fails to register with an error different from '-ENODEV', the error is detected and returned. Change the code accordingly and remove the OF code from the driver. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818082316.2717095-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-08-18 08:23:15 +00:00
static const struct of_device_id imx_sc_thermal_table[] = {
thermal/drivers/imx_sc: Rely on the platform data to get the resource id Currently the imx_sc driver is reimplementing part of the thermal zone parsing from the thermal OF tree code to get the sensor id associated with a thermal zone sensor. The driver platform specific code should know what sensor is present and not rely on the thermal zone description to do a discovery. Well that is arguable but all the other drivers have a per platform data telling what sensor id to use. The imx_sc thermal driver is the only one using a different approach. Not invalid but forcing to keep a specific function 'thermal_zone_of_get_sensor_id()' to get the sensor id for a specific thermal zone as the self-explanatory function tells and having device tree code inside the driver. The thermal OF code had a rework and remains now self-encapsulated with a register/unregister functions and their 'devm' variants, except for the function mentioned above. After investigating, it appears the imx_sc sensor is defined in arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi: which defines the cpu-thermal zone with the id: IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM This dtsi is included by: - imx8qxp-ai_ml.dts - imx8qxp-colibri.dtsi - imx8qxp-mek.dts The two first ones do not define more thermal zones The third one adds the pmic-thermal0 zone with id: IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0 The thermal OF code returns -ENODEV if the thermal zone registration with a specific id fails because the description is not available in the DT for such a sensor id. In this case we continue with the other ids without bailing out with an error. So we can build for the 'fsl,imx-sc-thermal' a compatible data, an array of sensor ids containing IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM and IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0. The latter won't be found but that will not result in an error but a normal case where we continue the initialization with other ids. Just to clarify, it is what the thermal framework does and what the other drivers are expecting: when a registration fails with -ENODEV this is not an error but a case where the description is not found in the device tree, that be can the entire thermal zones description or a specific thermal zone with an unknown id. There is one small functional change but without impact. When there is no 'thermal-zones' description the probe function was returning '-ENODEV', now it returns zero. When a thermal zone fails to register with an error different from '-ENODEV', the error is detected and returned. Change the code accordingly and remove the OF code from the driver. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818082316.2717095-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-08-18 08:23:15 +00:00
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx-sc-thermal", .data = imx_sc_sensors },
{}
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_sc_thermal_table);
static struct platform_driver imx_sc_thermal_driver = {
.probe = imx_sc_thermal_probe,
.driver = {
.name = "imx-sc-thermal",
.of_match_table = imx_sc_thermal_table,
},
};
module_platform_driver(imx_sc_thermal_driver);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@nxp.com>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Thermal driver for NXP i.MX SoCs with system controller");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");