mirror of
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc.git
synced 2024-11-21 13:40:47 +00:00
[libiberty] remove TBAA violation in iterative_hash, improve code-gen
The following removes the TBAA violation present in iterative_hash. As we eventually LTO that it's important to fix. This also improves code generation for the >= 12 bytes loop by using | to compose the 4 byte words as at least GCC 7 and up can recognize that pattern and perform a 4 byte load while the variant with a + is not recognized (not on trunk either), I think we have an enhancement bug for this somewhere. Given we reliably merge and the bogus "optimized" path might be only relevant for archs that cannot do misaligned loads efficiently I've chosen to keep a specialization for aligned accesses. libiberty/ * hashtab.c (iterative_hash): Remove TBAA violating handling of aligned little-endian case in favor of just keeping the aligned case special-cased. Use | for composing a larger word.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5266f930be
commit
52ac4c6be8
@ -940,26 +940,23 @@ iterative_hash (const void *k_in /* the key */,
|
||||
c = initval; /* the previous hash value */
|
||||
|
||||
/*---------------------------------------- handle most of the key */
|
||||
#ifndef WORDS_BIGENDIAN
|
||||
/* On a little-endian machine, if the data is 4-byte aligned we can hash
|
||||
by word for better speed. This gives nondeterministic results on
|
||||
big-endian machines. */
|
||||
if (sizeof (hashval_t) == 4 && (((size_t)k)&3) == 0)
|
||||
while (len >= 12) /* aligned */
|
||||
/* Provide specialization for the aligned case for targets that cannot
|
||||
efficiently perform misaligned loads of a merged access. */
|
||||
if ((((size_t)k)&3) == 0)
|
||||
while (len >= 12)
|
||||
{
|
||||
a += *(hashval_t *)(k+0);
|
||||
b += *(hashval_t *)(k+4);
|
||||
c += *(hashval_t *)(k+8);
|
||||
a += (k[0] | ((hashval_t)k[1]<<8) | ((hashval_t)k[2]<<16) | ((hashval_t)k[3]<<24));
|
||||
b += (k[4] | ((hashval_t)k[5]<<8) | ((hashval_t)k[6]<<16) | ((hashval_t)k[7]<<24));
|
||||
c += (k[8] | ((hashval_t)k[9]<<8) | ((hashval_t)k[10]<<16)| ((hashval_t)k[11]<<24));
|
||||
mix(a,b,c);
|
||||
k += 12; len -= 12;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else /* unaligned */
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
while (len >= 12)
|
||||
{
|
||||
a += (k[0] +((hashval_t)k[1]<<8) +((hashval_t)k[2]<<16) +((hashval_t)k[3]<<24));
|
||||
b += (k[4] +((hashval_t)k[5]<<8) +((hashval_t)k[6]<<16) +((hashval_t)k[7]<<24));
|
||||
c += (k[8] +((hashval_t)k[9]<<8) +((hashval_t)k[10]<<16)+((hashval_t)k[11]<<24));
|
||||
a += (k[0] | ((hashval_t)k[1]<<8) | ((hashval_t)k[2]<<16) | ((hashval_t)k[3]<<24));
|
||||
b += (k[4] | ((hashval_t)k[5]<<8) | ((hashval_t)k[6]<<16) | ((hashval_t)k[7]<<24));
|
||||
c += (k[8] | ((hashval_t)k[9]<<8) | ((hashval_t)k[10]<<16)| ((hashval_t)k[11]<<24));
|
||||
mix(a,b,c);
|
||||
k += 12; len -= 12;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user