tree-optimization/115723 - ICE with .COND_ADD reduction

The following fixes an ICE with a .COND_ADD discovered as reduction
even though its else value isn't the reduction chain link but a
constant.  This would be wrong-code with --disable-checking I think.

	PR tree-optimization/115723
	* tree-vect-loop.cc (check_reduction_path): For a .COND_ADD
	verify the else value also refers to the reduction chain op.

	* gcc.dg/vect/pr115723.c: New testcase.
This commit is contained in:
Richard Biener 2024-07-01 10:06:55 +02:00 committed by Richard Biener
parent 382e2123c4
commit 286cda3461
2 changed files with 33 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
/* { dg-additional-options "-ffast-math -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations" } */
#include "tree-vect.h"
double __attribute__((noipa))
foo (double *x, double *y, int n)
{
double res = 0.;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
if (y[i] > 0.)
res += x[i];
else
res = 64.;
return res;
}
double y[16] = { 1., 1., 1., 1., 0., 1., 1., 1.,
1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1. };
int main ()
{
check_vect ();
if (foo (y, y, 16) != 64. + 11.)
abort ();
return 0;
}

View File

@ -4163,15 +4163,19 @@ pop:
FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT (op_use_stmt, imm_iter, op.ops[opi])
{
/* In case of a COND_OP (mask, op1, op2, op1) reduction we might have
op1 twice (once as definition, once as else) in the same operation.
Allow this. */
/* In case of a COND_OP (mask, op1, op2, op1) reduction we should
have op1 twice (once as definition, once as else) in the same
operation. Enforce this. */
if (cond_fn_p && op_use_stmt == use_stmt)
{
gcall *call = as_a<gcall *> (use_stmt);
unsigned else_pos
= internal_fn_else_index (internal_fn (op.code));
if (gimple_call_arg (call, else_pos) != op.ops[opi])
{
fail = true;
break;
}
for (unsigned int j = 0; j < gimple_call_num_args (call); ++j)
{
if (j == else_pos)