OpenMP: Accept argument to depobj's destroy clause

Since OpenMP 5.2, the destroy clause takes an depend argument as argument;
for the depobj directive, it the new argument is optional but, if present,
it must be identical to the directive's argument.

gcc/c/ChangeLog:

	* c-parser.cc (c_parser_omp_depobj): Accept optionally an argument
	to the destroy clause.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* parser.cc (cp_parser_omp_depobj): Accept optionally an argument
	to the destroy clause.

gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

	* openmp.cc (gfc_match_omp_depobj): Accept optionally an argument
	to the destroy clause.

libgomp/ChangeLog:

	* libgomp.texi (5.2 Impl. Status): An argument to the destroy clause
	is now supported.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* c-c++-common/gomp/depobj-3.c: New test.
	* gfortran.dg/gomp/depobj-3.f90: New test.
This commit is contained in:
Tobias Burnus 2023-11-24 15:10:49 +01:00
parent 726723c476
commit 1802f64e67
6 changed files with 124 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -21605,6 +21605,9 @@ c_parser_omp_critical (location_t loc, c_parser *parser, bool *if_p)
destroy
update (dependence-type)
OpenMP 5.2 additionally:
destroy ( depobj )
dependence-type:
in
out
@ -21663,7 +21666,26 @@ c_parser_omp_depobj (c_parser *parser)
clause = error_mark_node;
}
else if (!strcmp ("destroy", p))
kind = OMP_CLAUSE_DEPEND_LAST;
{
matching_parens c_parens;
kind = OMP_CLAUSE_DEPEND_LAST;
if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_OPEN_PAREN)
&& c_parens.require_open (parser))
{
tree destobj = c_parser_expr_no_commas (parser, NULL).value;
if (!lvalue_p (destobj))
error_at (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (destobj, c_loc),
"%<destroy%> expression is not lvalue expression");
else if (depobj != error_mark_node
&& !operand_equal_p (destobj, depobj,
OEP_MATCH_SIDE_EFFECTS
| OEP_LEXICOGRAPHIC))
warning_at (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (destobj, c_loc), 0,
"the %<destroy%> expression %qE should be the same "
"as the %<depobj%> argument %qE", destobj, depobj);
c_parens.skip_until_found_close (parser);
}
}
else if (!strcmp ("update", p))
{
matching_parens c_parens;

View File

@ -43173,6 +43173,9 @@ cp_parser_omp_critical (cp_parser *parser, cp_token *pragma_tok, bool *if_p)
destroy
update (dependence-type)
OpenMP 5.2 additionally:
destroy ( depobj )
dependence-type:
in
out
@ -43219,7 +43222,27 @@ cp_parser_omp_depobj (cp_parser *parser, cp_token *pragma_tok)
clause = error_mark_node;
}
else if (!strcmp ("destroy", p))
kind = OMP_CLAUSE_DEPEND_LAST;
{
kind = OMP_CLAUSE_DEPEND_LAST;
matching_parens c_parens;
if (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_OPEN_PAREN)
&& c_parens.require_open (parser))
{
tree destobj = cp_parser_assignment_expression (parser);
if (depobj != error_mark_node
&& destobj != error_mark_node
&& !operand_equal_p (destobj, depobj, OEP_MATCH_SIDE_EFFECTS
| OEP_LEXICOGRAPHIC))
warning_at (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (destobj, c_loc), 0,
"the %<destroy%> expression %qE should be the same "
"as the %<depobj%> argument %qE", destobj, depobj);
if (!c_parens.require_close (parser))
cp_parser_skip_to_closing_parenthesis (parser,
/*recovering=*/true,
/*or_comma=*/false,
/*consume_paren=*/true);
}
}
else if (!strcmp ("update", p))
{
matching_parens c_parens;

View File

@ -4731,10 +4731,20 @@ gfc_match_omp_depobj (void)
goto error;
}
}
else if (gfc_match ("destroy") == MATCH_YES)
else if (gfc_match ("destroy ") == MATCH_YES)
{
gfc_expr *destroyobj = NULL;
c = gfc_get_omp_clauses ();
c->destroy = true;
if (gfc_match (" ( %v ) ", &destroyobj) == MATCH_YES)
{
if (destroyobj->symtree != depobj->symtree)
gfc_warning (0, "The same depend object should be used as DEPOBJ "
"argument at %L and as DESTROY argument at %L",
&depobj->where, &destroyobj->where);
gfc_free_expr (destroyobj);
}
}
else if (gfc_match_omp_clauses (&c, omp_mask (OMP_CLAUSE_DEPEND), true, false)
!= MATCH_YES)

View File

@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
typedef struct __attribute__((__aligned__ (sizeof (void *)))) omp_depend_t {
char __omp_depend_t__[2 * sizeof (void *)];
} omp_depend_t;
void
f ()
{
omp_depend_t obj2;
struct { omp_depend_t c; } s;
float a;
#pragma omp depobj(s.c) depend(inout: a)
#pragma omp depobj(s.c) destroy(s.c) /* OK */
#pragma omp depobj(s.c) destroy(obj2)
/* { dg-warning "the 'destroy' expression 'obj2' should be the same as the 'depobj' argument 's.c'" "" { target c } .-1 } */
/* { dg-warning "the 'destroy' expression 'obj2' should be the same as the 'depobj' argument 's.f\\(\\)::<unnamed struct>::c'" "" { target c++ } .-2 } */
}
void
g ()
{
volatile omp_depend_t obj3;
#pragma omp depobj(obj3) destroy(obj3)
}
int
main ()
{
float a;
omp_depend_t obj;
#pragma omp depobj(obj) depend(inout: a)
#pragma omp depobj(obj) destroy(obj) /* OK */
#pragma omp depobj(obj) destroy(a + 5)
/* { dg-error "'destroy' expression is not lvalue expression" "" { target c } .-1 } */
/* { dg-warning "the 'destroy' expression '\\(a \\+ \\(float\\)5\\)' should be the same as the 'depobj' argument 'obj'" "" { target c++ } .-2 } */
#pragma omp depobj(obj+5) destroy(a)
/* { dg-error "invalid operands to binary \\+ \\(have 'omp_depend_t' and 'int'\\)" "" { target c } .-1 } */
/* { dg-error "no match for 'operator\\+' in 'obj \\+ 5' \\(operand types are 'omp_depend_t' and 'int'\\)" "" { target c++ } .-2 } */
#pragma omp depobj(obj) destroy(a) /* { dg-warning "the 'destroy' expression 'a' should be the same as the 'depobj' argument 'obj'" } */
return 0;
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
! { dg-do compile { target { fortran_integer_16 || ilp32 } } }
! omp_depend_kind = 2*intptr_t --> 16 (128 bit) on 64bit-pointer systems
! --> 8 (128 bit) on 32bit-pointer systems
subroutine f1
!use omp_lib ! N/A in gcc/testsuite
use iso_c_binding, only: c_intptr_t
implicit none
integer, parameter :: omp_depend_kind = 2*c_intptr_t
integer :: a, b
integer(kind=omp_depend_kind) :: depobj, depobj1(5), depobj2
!$omp depobj(depobj) destroy
!$omp depobj(depobj) destroy( depobj)
!$omp depobj(depobj) destroy( depobj2) ! { dg-warning "The same depend object should be used as DEPOBJ argument at .1. and as DESTROY argument at .2." }
!$omp depobj(depobj) destroy( a) ! { dg-warning "The same depend object should be used as DEPOBJ argument at .1. and as DESTROY argument at .2." }
end

View File

@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ to address of matching mapped list item per 5.1, Sect. 2.21.7.2 @tab N @tab
@code{-Wall}). Unknown clauses are always rejected with an error.}
@item Clauses on @code{end} directive can be on directive @tab Y @tab
@item @code{destroy} clause with destroy-var argument on @code{depobj}
@tab N @tab
@tab Y @tab
@item Deprecation of no-argument @code{destroy} clause on @code{depobj}
@tab N @tab
@item @code{linear} clause syntax changes and @code{step} modifier @tab Y @tab