This commit marks the test runner's snapshot testing API as
stable.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55897
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Pietro Marchini <pietro.marchini94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
This function does not require a CLI flag, does not emit a warning,
and is a fairly simple API that is already being used heavily in
the ecosystem. This commit marks context.plan() as stable.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55895
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Pietro Marchini <pietro.marchini94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
This commit allows the node:sqlite module to be used without
starting Node with a CLI flag. The module is still experimental.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/55854
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55890
Reviewed-By: Jake Yuesong Li <jake.yuesong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54181
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55856
Reviewed-By: Pietro Marchini <pietro.marchini94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Raz Luvaton <rluvaton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55846
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Setting of UV_THREADPOOL_SIZE from inside process using
process.env.UV_THREADPOOL_SIZE is not guaranteed to work as
the thread pool would have been created as part of the runtime
initialisation much before user code is run.
update doc/api/cli.md
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55832
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/49686
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55810
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
This improves Permission Model usage when allowing read access to
specifi modules. To achieve that, the permission model check on
internalModuleStat has been removed meaning that on module loading,
uv_fs_stat is performed on files and folders even when the permission
model is enabled. Although a uv_fs_stat is performed, reading/executing
the module will still pass by the permission model check.
Without this PR when an app tries to --allow-fs-read=./a.js
--allow-fs-read=./b.js where `a` attempt to load b, it will fails as
it reads $pwd and no permission has been given to this path.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55797
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55788
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55766
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54869
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <livia@cirno.name>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
reword "child" to "child process" wherever possible.
this helps in maintaining clarity and precision,
consistency while avoiding misinterpretation.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55654
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
The code sample at the top of the "Performance measurements API"
section of the docs does not run.
The code in question:
```js
const { PerformanceObserver, performance } = require('node:perf_hooks');
const obs = new PerformanceObserver((items) => {
console.log(items.getEntries()[0].duration);
performance.clearMarks();
});
obs.observe({ type: 'measure' });
performance.measure('Start to Now');
performance.mark('A');
doSomeLongRunningProcess(() => {
performance.measure('A to Now', 'A');
performance.mark('B');
performance.measure('A to B', 'A', 'B');
});
```
If you replace `doSomeLongRunningProcess` with an IIFE with a sleep()
at the top of it, you get this:
```js
const { PerformanceObserver, performance } = require('node:perf_hooks');
const obs = new PerformanceObserver((items) => {
console.log(items.getEntries()[0].duration);
performance.clearMarks();
});
obs.observe({ type: 'measure' });
performance.measure('Start to Now');
performance.mark('A');
(async function doSomeLongRunningProcess() {
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 5000));
performance.measure('A to Now', 'A');
performance.mark('B');
performance.measure('A to B', 'A', 'B');
})()
```
When you run this, you get the following output:
```sh
$ node performance-test.js
17.873416
node:internal/per_context/domexception:53
ErrorCaptureStackTrace(this);
^
DOMException [SyntaxError]: The "A" performance mark has not been set
at new DOMException (node:internal/per_context/domexception:53:5)
at __node_internal_ (node:internal/util:695:10)
at getMark (node:internal/perf/usertiming:65:11)
at calculateStartDuration (node:internal/perf/usertiming:202:13)
at measure (node:internal/perf/usertiming:220:7)
at Performance.measure (node:internal/perf/performance:135:12)
at /private/tmp/performance-test.js:14:15
Node.js v20.11.1
```
I believe it's due to the call to `performance.clearMarks();` in the
PerformanceObserver callback. If you remove that, it works as expected:
```js
const { PerformanceObserver, performance } = require('node:perf_hooks');
const obs = new PerformanceObserver((items) => {
console.log(items.getEntries()[0].duration);
});
obs.observe({ type: 'measure' });
performance.measure('Start to Now');
performance.mark('A');
(async function doSomeLongRunningProcess() {
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 5000));
performance.measure('A to Now', 'A');
performance.mark('B');
performance.measure('A to B', 'A', 'B');
})()
```
```sh
$ node performance-test.js
17.761083
5002.468417
```
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54227
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
`util.getCallSite` returns an array of call site objects. Rename the
function to reflect that it returns a given count of frames captured
as an array of call site object.
Renames the first parameter `frames` to be `frameCount` to indicate
that it specifies the count of returned call sites.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55626
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Many user reported issues show poor awareness of the
nature of console streams. explicitly document that.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55616
Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
