This will be a start to generalize all argument validation
errors. As currently we throw ARG/OPT, OUT_OF_RANGE, and other more
specific errors.
The OPT errors didn't bring much to the errors as it's just another
variant of ARG error which is sometimes more confusing (some of our code
used OPT errors to denote just argument validation errors presumably
because of similarity of OPT to 'option' and not 'options-object')
and they don't specify the name of the options object where the invalid
value is located. Much better approach would be to just specify path
to the invalid value in the name of the value as it is done in this PR
(i.e. 'options.format', 'options.publicKey.type' etc)
Also since this decreases a variety of errors we have it'd be easier to
reuse validation code across the codebase.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31251
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34070#discussion_r467251009
Signed-off-by: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34682
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This completely refactors the `expectsError` behavior: so far it's
almost identical to `assert.throws(fn, object)` in case it was used
with a function as first argument. It had a magical property check
that allowed to verify a functions `type` in case `type` was passed
used in the validation object. This pattern is now completely removed
and `assert.throws()` should be used instead.
The main intent for `common.expectsError()` is to verify error cases
for callback based APIs. This is now more flexible by accepting all
validation possibilites that `assert.throws()` accepts as well. No
magical properties exist anymore. This reduces surprising behavior
for developers who are not used to the Node.js core code base.
This has the side effect that `common` is used significantly less
frequent.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31092
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
If require.resolve() is passed an options object, but
the paths option is not present, then use the default
require.resolve() paths.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/28078
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/28077
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <zyszys98@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This commit adds input validation to require.resolve()'s
paths option. Prior to this change, passing in a non-array
value lead to a misleading 'module not found' error.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/27583
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27613
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Include the require stack in the reported error message.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25690
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
