This unflags --experimental-require-module so require(esm) can be
used without the flag. For now, when require() actually encounters
an ESM, it will still emit an experimental warning. To opt out
of the feature, --no-experimental-require-module can be used.
There are some tests specifically testing ERR_REQUIRE_ESM. Some
of them are repurposed to test --no-experimental-require-module.
Some of them are modified to just expect loading require(esm) to
work, when it's appropriate.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55085
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/52697
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <livia@cirno.name>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <panva.ip@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
It was intended that warnings should only be emitted for an
existing package.json without a type. This fixes a confusing
warning telling users to update /package.json when there are
no package.json on the lookup path at all, like this:
[MODULE_TYPELESS_PACKAGE_JSON] Warning: ... parsed as an ES module
because module syntax was detected; to avoid the performance penalty
of syntax detection, add "type": "module" to /package.json
Drive-by: update the warning message to be clear about
reparsing and make it clear what's actionable.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/54045
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/53619
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Our CI already run test files in parallel, having `node:test` spawns
child processes concurrently could lead to oversubscribing the CI
machine. This commit sets the `concurrency` depending
on the presence of `TEST_PARALLEL` in the env, so running the test
file individually still spawns child processes concurrently, and
running the whole test suite does not oversubscribe the machine.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/52177
Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/50987
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <jacob@frende.me>
